High-ionization emission line ratios from quasar broad line regions: metallicity or density?
Matthew J. Temple, Gary J. Ferland, Amy L. Rankine, Marios Chatzikos, and Paul C. Hewett

TL;DR
This study challenges the assumption that high-ionization emission line ratios directly indicate metallicity in quasar broad line regions, showing instead that density and ionization conditions can explain observed variations.
Contribution
It demonstrates that variations in line ratios are due to physical conditions like density and ionization, not metallicity, and proposes a model with two kinematically distinct emission regions.
Findings
Line ratios do not vary with luminosity, black hole mass, or accretion rate.
Observed line ratio changes can be explained by gas with solar metallicity under varying physical conditions.
Quasar emission regions likely consist of high-density clouds and lower-density gas, affecting line ratios.
Abstract
The flux ratios of high-ionization lines are commonly assumed to indicate the metallicity of the broad emission line region in luminous quasars. When accounting for the variation in their kinematic profiles, we show that the NV/CIV, (SiIV+OIV])/CIV and NV/Lya line ratios do not vary as a function of the quasar continuum luminosity, black hole mass, or accretion rate. Using photoionization models from CLOUDY , we further show that the observed changes in these line ratios can be explained by emission from gas with solar abundances, if the physical conditions of the emitting gas are allowed to vary over a broad range of densities and ionizing fluxes. The diversity of broad line emission in quasar spectra can be explained by a model with emission from two kinematically distinct regions, where the line ratios suggest that these regions have either very different metallicity or density. Both…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
