Matter without mass: do we really need the concept of mass?
Luigi Foschini

TL;DR
This paper questions the necessity of the concept of mass in physics, proposing that focusing on energy and time could resolve existing confusions and lead to new cosmological insights.
Contribution
It introduces a perspective that abandons the traditional idea of mass, emphasizing energy and time, and explores implications for quantum vacuum energy and universe rotation.
Findings
Cutoff frequency of quantum vacuum energy aligns with CMB observations
Hypothesis of a rotating, expanding universe with Kerr-de Sitter metric
Potential link between vacuum energy cutoff and cosmological constant
Abstract
Einstein's most famous equation -- -- generated a short-circuit between the concepts of mass and energy, which also affects other concepts like matter, radiation, and vacuum. Physics currently has a mixture of classical, relativistic, and quantum concepts of mass, which generates a great deal of confusion and many problems. Clear definitions need to be established if one wants to avoid ghost hunting. In particular, by abandoning the idea of mass and focusing on time and energy, some interesting implications are emerging. It is noted that the cutoff frequency of the quantum vacuum energy, consistent with the observations of the cosmological constant, corresponds to that of the Cosmic Microwave Background. This might be consistent with the hypothesis of a rotating and expanding universe described by a Kerr-de Sitter metric with the observed cosmological constant. To verify this…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCosmology and Gravitation Theories · Relativity and Gravitational Theory · Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
