Comparison of Convexificated SQCQP and PSO for the Optimal Transmission System Operation based on Incremental In-Phase and Quadrature Voltage Controlled Transformers
Marcel Sarstedt, Thomas Leveringhaus, Leonard Klu{\ss}, Lutz Hofmann

TL;DR
This paper compares a convexified SQCQP approach and a modified PSO algorithm for solving the security constrained optimal power flow problem, focusing on in-phase and quadrature transformer control, with a benchmark on the IEEE 118-bus system.
Contribution
It introduces and compares a convexified SQCQP and a tailored PSO method for SCOPF considering transformer controls, highlighting their respective advantages.
Findings
Both methods produce suitable SCOPF results.
SQCQP offers higher quality and reproducibility.
PSO provides faster solutions in complex scenarios.
Abstract
The optimal operation of electrical energy systems by solving a security constrained optimal power flow (SCOPF) problem is still a challenging research aspect. Especially, for conventional optimization methods like sequential quadratic constrained quadratic programming (SQCQP) the formulation of the incremental control variables like in-phase and quadrature voltage controlled transformers in a solver suitable way is complex. Compared to this, the implementation of these control variables within heuristic approaches like the particle swarm optimization (PSO) is simple but problem specific adaptations of the classic PSO algorithm are necessary to avoid an unfortunate swarm behavior and local convergence in bad results. The objective of this paper is to introduce a SQCQP and a modified PSO approach in detail to solve the SCOPF problem adequately under consideration of flexible incremental…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
