Statistical issues in Serial Killer Nurse cases
Richard D. Gill, Norman Fenton, David Lagnado

TL;DR
This paper examines the statistical and cognitive biases involved in investigating suspected medical serial killers, highlighting case studies and proposing improved investigative approaches.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of statistical issues and biases in serial killer nurse cases, with new findings on the Ben Geen case and recommendations for future investigations.
Findings
Identification of cognitive biases in investigations
Statistical analysis of the Ben Geen case
Recommendations for reducing bias in future cases
Abstract
We study statistical aspects of the case of the British nurse Ben Geen, convicted of 2 counts of murder and 15 of grievous bodily harm following events at Horton General Hospital (in the town of Banbury, Oxfordshire, UK) during December 2013-February 2014. We draw attention to parallels with the cases of nurses Lucia de Berk (the Netherlands) and Daniela Poggiali (Italy), in both of which an initial conviction for multiple murders of patients was overturned after reopening of the case. We pay most attention to the investigative processes by which data, and not just statistical data, is generated; namely, the identification of past cases in which the nurse under suspicion might have been involved. We argue that the investigation and prosecution of such cases is vulnerable to many cognitive biases and errors of reasoning about uncertainty, complicated by the fact that fact-finders have to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCensus and Population Estimation · Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
