TL;DR
This paper clarifies the complex landscape of fairness metrics in machine learning, analyzing their differences, implications, and relationships to better understand their application in AI decision-making.
Contribution
It provides a systematic analysis of various fairness definitions, highlighting their nuances, differences, and the orthogonality among them to organize the existing landscape.
Findings
Clarifies distinctions between fairness notions
Analyzes implications of different fairness metrics
Provides a structured overview of fairness landscape
Abstract
In recent years, the problem of addressing fairness in Machine Learning (ML) and automatic decision-making has attracted a lot of attention in the scientific communities dealing with Artificial Intelligence. A plethora of different definitions of fairness in ML have been proposed, that consider different notions of what is a "fair decision" in situations impacting individuals in the population. The precise differences, implications and "orthogonality" between these notions have not yet been fully analyzed in the literature. In this work, we try to make some order out of this zoo of definitions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
