Comparing simulations and experiments of positive streamers in air: steps toward model validation

TL;DR

This study compares experimental observations and fluid model simulations of positive air streamers at 100 mbar to validate the model, finding good qualitative agreement but some quantitative differences influenced by parameters like temperature.

Contribution

It provides a detailed comparison between experimental data and a 2D fluid model for positive streamers, advancing model validation efforts in streamer physics.

Findings

Qualitative agreement in optical emission profiles and streamer velocity.

Simulated streamer velocity is 20-30% lower than experiments.

Temperature effects may explain some discrepancies.

Abstract

We compare simulations and experiments of single positive streamer discharges in air at 100 mbar, aiming towards model validation. Experimentally, streamers are generated in a plate-plate geometry with a protruding needle. We are able to capture the complete time evolution of reproducible single-filament streamers with a ns gate-time camera. A 2D axisymmetric drift-diffusion-reaction fluid model is used to simulate streamers under conditions closely matching those of the experiments. Streamer velocities, radii and light emission profiles are compared between model and experiment. Good qualitative agreement is observed between the experimental and simulated optical emission profiles, and for the streamer velocity and radius during the entire evolution. Quantitatively, the simulated streamer velocity is about 20% to 30% lower at the same streamer length, and the simulated radius is about 1 mm (20% to 30%) smaller. The effect of various parameters on the agreement between model and experiment is studied, such as the used transport data, the background ionization level, the photoionization rate, the gas temperature, the voltage rise time and the voltage boundary conditions. An increase in gas temperature due to the 50 Hz experimental repetition frequency could probably account for some of the observed discrepancies.