Dislocation Non-Hermitian Skin Effect
Frank Schindler, Abhinav Prem

TL;DR
This paper reveals how crystal defects can serve as probes for non-Hermitian topological phases, showing that dislocations induce localized states and skin effects in various non-Hermitian systems, including gapless ones with exceptional points.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of dislocation-induced non-Hermitian skin effects and relates them to bulk topology in both gapped and gapless non-Hermitian systems.
Findings
Dislocations can induce skin effects in non-Hermitian systems.
Strong point-gap topology can cause dislocation responses without skin effects.
Gapless systems with exceptional points exhibit localized dislocation responses.
Abstract
We demonstrate that crystal defects can act as a probe of intrinsic non-Hermitian topology. In particular, in point-gapped systems with periodic boundary conditions, a pair of dislocations may induce a non-Hermitian skin effect, where an extensive number of Hamiltonian eigenstates localize at only one of the two dislocations. An example of such a phase are two-dimensional systems exhibiting weak non-Hermitian topology, which are adiabatically related to a decoupled stack of Hatano-Nelson chains. Moreover, we show that strong two-dimensional point-gap topology may also result in a dislocation response, even when there is no skin effect present with open boundary conditions. For both cases, we directly relate their bulk topology to a stable dislocation non-Hermitian skin effect. Finally, and in stark contrast to the Hermitian case, we find that gapless non-Hermitian systems hosting bulk…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics · Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
