Bidemocratic bases and their connections with other greedy-type bases
Fernando Albiac, Jose L. Ansorena, Miguel Berasategui, Pablo, M. Berna, Silvia Lassalle

TL;DR
This paper explores bidemocratic bases in nonlinear greedy approximation, showing they can lack quasi-greediness, and introduces new methods and characterizations for these bases, expanding understanding beyond their traditional dual roles.
Contribution
It demonstrates that bidemocratic bases need not be quasi-greedy and introduces novel construction and characterization techniques for these bases.
Findings
Bidemocratic bases can be non-quasi-greedy.
For each 1<p<∞, ℓ_p has a bidemocratic basis that is not quasi-greedy.
New concepts of truncation quasi-greediness and partial democracy characterize bidemocratic bases.
Abstract
In nonlinear greedy approximation theory, bidemocratic bases have traditionally played the role of dualizing democratic, greedy, quasi-greedy, or almost greedy bases. In this article we shift the viewpoint and study them for their own sake, just as we would with any other kind of greedy-type bases. In particular we show that bidemocratic bases need not be quasi-greedy, despite the fact that they retain a strong unconditionality flavor which brings them very close to being quasi-greedy. Our constructive approach gives that for each the space has a bidemocratic basis which is not quasi-greedy. We also present a novel method for constructing conditional quasi-greedy bases which are bidemocratic, and provide a characterization of bidemocratic bases in terms of the new concepts of truncation quasi-greediness and partially democratic bases.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Algebra and Logic · Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic · Fuzzy and Soft Set Theory
