Assessing Brazilian agri-food policies: what impact on family farms?
Valdemar J. Wesz Junior, Simone Piras, Catia Grisa, Stefano Ghinoi

TL;DR
This study evaluates the impact of Brazilian family farming policies on food product commercialization, revealing that financial support and technical assistance boost commercialization, while seed distribution has limited effect, emphasizing the importance of balanced policies.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence on how specific policies influence commercialization among Brazilian family farms using household data and propensity score matching.
Findings
Pronaf significantly increases commercialization propensity.
Access to technical assistance benefits smaller farms.
Seed distribution does not significantly enhance commercialization.
Abstract
Since the beginning of the 1990s, Brazil has introduced different policies for increasing agricultural production among family farms, such as the National Program for Strengthening Family Farming (Pronaf), the technical assistance and rural extension programmes (ATER), and seeds distribution. Despite the importance of these policies for the development of family farming, there is a lack of empirical studies investigating their impact on commercialization of food products. By considering household-level data from the 2014 Brazilian National Household Sample Survey, we use propensity score matching techniques accounting for the interaction effects between policies to compare the commercialisation behaviour of recipients with non recipients. We find that Pronaf has a significant positive impact on family farmers propensity to engage in commercialisation, and this effect increases if…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAgricultural Innovations and Practices · Rural Development and Agriculture · Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
