On the investigation of properties of superfluid $^4$He turbulence using a hot-wire signal
P. Diribarne, M. Bon-Mardion, A. Girard, J.-P. Moro, B. Rousset, F., Chilla, J. Salort, A. Braslau, F. Daviaud, B. Dubrulle, B. Gallet, I., Moukharski, E.-W. Saw, C. Baudet, M. Gibert, P.-E. Roche, E. Rusaouen, A., Golov, V. L'vov, S. Nazarenko

TL;DR
This study investigates superfluid helium turbulence using hot-wire measurements, revealing that a high-frequency bump in the signal correlates with turbulence intensity and small-scale flow properties, challenging existing vortex shedding models.
Contribution
It extends the analysis of hot-wire signal features in superfluid helium, showing the bump frequency depends on turbulence intensity and is independent of temperature, suggesting new physical mechanisms.
Findings
Bump frequency is independent of temperature.
Bump frequency correlates with turbulence intensity.
Vortex shedding model does not explain the bump.
Abstract
We report hot-wire measurements performed in two very different, co- and counter-rotating flows, in normal and superfluid helium at 1.6 K, 2 K, and 2.3 K. As recently reported, the power spectrum of the hot-wire signal in superfluid flows exhibits a significant bump at high frequency (Diribarne et al. [1]). We confirm that the bump frequency does not depend significantly on the temperature and further extend the previous analysis of the velocity dependence of the bump, over more than one decade of velocity. The main result is that the bump frequency depends on the turbulence intensity of the flow, and that using the turbulent Reynolds number rather than the velocity as a control parameter collapses results from both co- and counter-rotating flows. The vortex shedding model previously proposed, in its current form, does not account for this observation. This suggests that the physical…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
