Sentiment analysis in tweets: an assessment study from classical to modern text representation models

TL;DR

This study comprehensively evaluates various classical and modern text representation models for sentiment analysis in tweets across 22 datasets, highlighting the impact of different embeddings and fine-tuning strategies on classification performance.

Contribution

It provides a robust assessment of static and contextualized language models for tweet sentiment analysis using diverse datasets and classification algorithms, addressing gaps in prior evaluations.

Findings

Transformer-based models outperform traditional methods.

Fine-tuning improves sentiment classification accuracy.

Contextual embeddings show robustness across datasets.

Abstract

With the growth of social medias, such as Twitter, plenty of user-generated data emerge daily. The short texts published on Twitter -- the tweets -- have earned significant attention as a rich source of information to guide many decision-making processes. However, their inherent characteristics, such as the informal, and noisy linguistic style, remain challenging to many natural language processing (NLP) tasks, including sentiment analysis. Sentiment classification is tackled mainly by machine learning-based classifiers. The literature has adopted word representations from distinct natures to transform tweets to vector-based inputs to feed sentiment classifiers. The representations come from simple count-based methods, such as bag-of-words, to more sophisticated ones, such as BERTweet, built upon the trendy BERT architecture. Nevertheless, most studies mainly focus on evaluating those models using only a small number of datasets. Despite the progress made in recent years in language modelling, there is still a gap regarding a robust evaluation of induced embeddings applied to sentiment analysis on tweets. Furthermore, while fine-tuning the model from downstream tasks is prominent nowadays, less attention has been given to adjustments based on the specific linguistic style of the data. In this context, this study fulfils an assessment of existing language models in distinguishing the sentiment expressed in tweets by using a rich collection of 22 datasets from distinct domains and five classification algorithms. The evaluation includes static and contextualized representations. Contexts are assembled from Transformer-based autoencoder models that are also fine-tuned based on the masked language model task, using a plethora of strategies.