Towards a General Many-Sorted Framework for Describing Certain Kinds of Legal Statutes with a Potential Computational Realization
Danny A. J. Gomez-Ramirez, Egil Nordqvist

TL;DR
This paper introduces a many-sorted first-order logic framework grounded in physical objects to formalize legal statutes, exemplified by Swedish property purchase laws, aiming to aid in developing AI legal assistants.
Contribution
It presents a novel formal framework for describing legal statutes using many-sorted logic, bridging legal theory and computational logic with practical applications.
Findings
Formal translation of Swedish property law statute
Framework grounded in physical objects and situations
Potential for AI legal assistance development
Abstract
Examining a 20th-century Scandinavian legal theoretical tradition, we can extract an ontological naturalistic, a logical empiristic, and a modern idealistic rationale. We introduce the mathematical syntactic figure present in the `logical empiricism' in a contemporary mathematical logic. A new formal framework for describing explicit purchase statutes (Sweden) is gradually developed and subsequently proposed. This new framework is based on a many-sorted first-order logic (MFOL) approach, where the semantics are grounded in concrete `physical' objects and situations with a legal relevance. Specifically, we present a concrete formal syntactic translation of one of the central statutes of Swedish legislation for the purchase of immovable property. Additionally, we discuss the potential implications that a subsequent development of such formalisations would have for constructing artificial…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComparative and International Law Studies · Artificial Intelligence in Law · Judicial and Constitutional Studies
