Prediction error quantification through probabilistic scaling -- EXTENDED VERSION
Victor Mirasierra, Martina Mammarella, Fabrizio Dabbene, Teodoro Alamo

TL;DR
This paper introduces a sample-based probabilistic scaling method to quantify prediction errors, providing bounds that are independent of model complexity and extendable to multiple predictors.
Contribution
It presents a novel probabilistic scaling approach for error quantification that is model-agnostic and applicable to finite predictor families.
Findings
Provides probabilistic upper bounds on prediction errors
Sample size is independent of model complexity
Method extended to multiple predictors
Abstract
In this paper, we address the probabilistic error quantification of a general class of prediction methods. We consider a given prediction model and show how to obtain, through a sample-based approach, a probabilistic upper bound on the absolute value of the prediction error. The proposed scheme is based on a probabilistic scaling methodology in which the number of required randomized samples is independent of the complexity of the prediction model. The methodology is extended to address the case in which the probabilistic uncertain quantification is required to be valid for every member of a finite family of predictors. We illustrate the results of the paper by means of a numerical example.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsProbabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference · Statistical Methods and Inference
