Logic of paradoxes in classical set theories
Boris \v{C}ulina

TL;DR
This paper introduces the productivity principle, a logical truth that acts as a regulator for set theories, helping to understand and identify paradoxical classes and limitations within classical set theories like ZFC.
Contribution
It formulates the productivity principle as a logical regulator, providing a new framework to analyze paradoxes and limitations in classical set theories.
Findings
The productivity principle explains the logical bounds of set concepts.
It shows how paradoxical classes follow from the principle.
It suggests a new approach for developing consistent set theories.
Abstract
Set theoretical paradoxes have a common root -- lack of understanding of why some multitudes are not sets. Why some multitudes of objects of thought cannot themselves be objects of thought? Moreover, it is a logical truth that such multitudes do exist. However we do not understand this logical truth so well as we understand, for example, the logical truth . In this paper, we formulate a logical truth which we call the productivity principle. Bertrand Rusell was the first one to formulate this principle, but in a restricted form and with a different purpose. The principle explicates a logical mechanism that lies behind paradoxical multitudes and is understandable as well as any simple logical truth. However, it does not explain the concept of set. It only sets logical bounds of the concept within the framework of the classical two-valued - language. The principle…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPhilosophy and History of Science · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
