Feature extraction and evaluation for BioMedical Question Answering
Ankit Shah, Srishti Singh, Shih-Yen Tao

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the BioASQ pipeline's feature extraction and sentence selection modules across various question types, providing insights and metrics to guide future improvements in biomedical question answering systems.
Contribution
It offers an empirical evaluation of pipeline modules for biomedical QA, highlighting their effectiveness and proposing metrics for future research.
Findings
Different modules impact question types variably
Error analysis identifies key areas for improvement
Metrics established to guide future pipeline enhancements
Abstract
In this paper, we present our work on the BioASQ pipeline. The goal is to answer four types of questions: summary, yes/no, factoids, and list. Our goal is to empirically evaluate different modules involved: the feature extractor and the sentence selection block. We used our pipeline to test the effectiveness of each module for all kinds of question types and perform error analysis. We defined metrics that are useful for future research related to the BioASQ pipeline critical to improve the performance of the training pipeline.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopic Modeling · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
