Kinetic screening in nonlinear stellar oscillations and gravitational collapse
Miguel Bezares, Lotte ter Haar, Marco Crisostomi, Enrico Barausse,, Carlos Palenzuela

TL;DR
This paper investigates the behavior of k-essence scalar-tensor theories in stellar oscillations and gravitational collapse, demonstrating the screening mechanism's effectiveness and challenges in dynamic scenarios, with potential detectability of scalar signals by space-based detectors.
Contribution
It constructs nonlinear stellar solutions in k-essence theories, analyzes the screening mechanism during oscillations and collapse, and introduces a method to evolve collapsing stars past characteristic speed divergences.
Findings
Screening suppresses scalar emission in stellar oscillations.
Collapse can lead to diverging scalar characteristic speeds.
Potential detection of scalar signals by space-borne interferometers like LISA.
Abstract
We consider k-essence, a scalar-tensor theory with first-order derivative self-interactions that can screen local scales from scalar fifth forces, while allowing for sizeable deviations from General Relativity on cosmological scales. We construct fully nonlinear static stellar solutions that show the presence of this screening mechanism, and we use them as initial data for simulations of stellar oscillations and gravitational collapse in spherical symmetry. We find that for k-essence theories of relevance for cosmology, the screening mechanism works in the case of stellar oscillation and suppresses the monopole scalar emission to undetectable levels. In collapsing stars, we find that the Cauchy problem, although locally well posed, can lead to diverging characteristic speeds for the scalar field. By introducing a ''fixing equation'' in the spirit of J. Cayuso, N. Ortiz, and L. Lehner…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
