Galactic Extinction: How Many Novae Does it Hide and How Does it Affect the Galactic Nova Rate?
A. Kawash, L. Chomiuk, J. A. Rodriguez, J. Strader, K. V. Sokolovsky,, E. Aydi, C. S. Kochanek, K. Z. Stanek, K. Mukai, K. De, B. Shappee, T. W.-S., Holoien, J. L. Prieto, and T. A. Thompson

TL;DR
This study uses 3D dust maps to assess how interstellar extinction affects the detectability of Galactic novae, suggesting that dust significantly obscures many novae and revising the estimated Galactic nova rate to around 30-40 per year.
Contribution
It introduces a novel application of 3D dust maps to quantify the impact of dust on nova detection and refines the Galactic nova rate estimate based on multiple survey comparisons.
Findings
Only about 48% of novae are detectable with current optical surveys.
Dust substantially reduces nova detection rates in the optical.
The tentative Galactic nova rate is estimated at around 40 per year.
Abstract
There is a longstanding discrepancy between the observed Galactic classical nova rate of yr and the predicted rate from Galactic models of --50 yr. One explanation for this discrepancy is that many novae are hidden by interstellar extinction, but the degree to which dust can obscure novae is poorly constrained. We use newly available all-sky three-dimensional dust maps to compare the brightness and spatial distribution of known novae to that predicted from relatively simple models in which novae trace Galactic stellar mass. We find that only half (\%) of novae are expected to be easily detectable () with current all-sky optical surveys such as the All-Sky Automated Survey for Supernovae (ASAS-SN). This fraction is much lower than previously estimated, showing that dust does substantially affect nova detection in the optical. By…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
