The three-step workflow: a pragmatic approach to allocating academic hospitals' affiliations for bibliometric purposes
Andrea Reyes Elizondo, Clara Calero-Medina, Martijn S. Visser

TL;DR
This paper introduces a three-step workflow to classify academic hospital affiliations for bibliometric analysis, enabling consistent allocation of publications across diverse hospital-university relationships worldwide.
Contribution
It proposes a standardized classification system and workflow to assign hospital-affiliated publications, improving comparability in university rankings.
Findings
The workflow distinguishes three hospital-university models.
It defines two relationship types: 'associate' and 'component'.
Standardizes publication allocation for global comparisons.
Abstract
This paper presents a method for classifying the varying degrees of interdependency between academic hospitals and universities in the context of the Leiden Ranking. A key question for ranking universities is whether or not to allocate the publication output of affiliated hospitals to universities. Hospital nomenclatures vary worldwide to denote some form of collaboration with a university: academic hospitals, teaching hospitals, university hospitals, and academic medical centres do not correspond to universally standard definitions. Thus, rather than seeking a normative definition of academic hospitals, we are proposing a workflow that aligns the university-hospital relationship with one of three general models: full integration of the hospital and the medical faculty into a single organization; health science centres in which hospitals and medical faculty remain separate entities…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
