Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmology from Cosmic Shear and Robustness to Modeling Uncertainty
L. F. Secco, S. Samuroff, E. Krause, B. Jain, J. Blazek, M. Raveri, A., Campos, A. Amon, A. Chen, C. Doux, A. Choi, D. Gruen, G. M. Bernstein, C., Chang, J. DeRose, J. Myles, A. Fert\'e, P. Lemos, D. Huterer, J. Prat, M. A., Troxel, N. MacCrann, A. R. Liddle, T. Kacprzak

TL;DR
This paper presents cosmic shear measurements from DES Year 3 data, constraining cosmological parameters with high precision, comparing results with other surveys and CMB data, and testing robustness against modeling uncertainties.
Contribution
It provides the first high-precision cosmic shear constraints from DES Y3, compares with other surveys and CMB, and assesses robustness to modeling uncertainties.
Findings
DES Y3 constrains S8 at 3% level in ΛCDM
Results are consistent with Planck CMB within 2.3σ
Robustness tests show minimal bias from modeling uncertainties
Abstract
This work and its companion paper, Amon et al. (2021), present cosmic shear measurements and cosmological constraints from over 100 million source galaxies in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 3 data. We constrain the lensing amplitude parameter at the 3% level in CDM: (68% CL). Our constraint is at the 2% level when using angular scale cuts that are optimized for the CDM analysis: (68% CL). With cosmic shear alone, we find no statistically significant constraint on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter at our present statistical power. We carry out our analysis blind, and compare our measurement with constraints from two other contemporary weak-lensing experiments: the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS) and Hyper-Suprime Camera Subaru Strategic Program (HSC). We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
