Evidence for multiple origins of fast declining Type II supernovae from spectropolarimetry of SN 2013ej and SN 2017ahn
T. Nagao, F. Patat, S. Taubenberger, D. Baade, T. Faran, A. Cikota, D., J. Sand, M. Bulla, H. Kuncarayakti, J. R. Maund, L. Tartaglia, S. Valenti and, D. E. Reichart

TL;DR
This study uses spectropolarimetry to investigate the origins of fast declining Type II supernovae, revealing evidence for multiple progenitor pathways and explosion geometries.
Contribution
It provides the first spectropolarimetric comparison of two Type IIL supernovae, demonstrating different explosion geometries and suggesting multiple progenitor origins.
Findings
SN 2013ej shows high, variable polarization indicating aspherical explosion and CSM interaction.
SN 2017ahn exhibits low polarization, implying a nearly spherical explosion.
Type IIL SNe have diverse origins, linked to different progenitor properties.
Abstract
The origin of the diverse light-curve shapes of Type II supernovae (SNe), and whether they come from similar or distinct progenitors, has been actively discussed for decades. Here we report spectropolarimetry of two fast declining Type II (Type IIL) SNe: SN 2013ej and SN 2017ahn. SN 2013ej exhibited high continuum polarization from very soon after the explosion to the radioactive tail phase with time-variable polarization angles. The origin of this polarimetric behavior can be interpreted as the combination of two different aspherical structures, namely an aspherical interaction of the SN ejecta with circumstellar matter (CSM) and an inherently aspherical explosion. Aspherical explosions are a common feature of slowly declining Type II (Type IIP) SNe. By contrast, SN 2017ahn showed low polarization not only in the photospheric phase but also in the radioactive tail phase. This low…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
