The importance of being honest: Correlating self-report accuracy and network centrality with academic performance
A. Fronzetti Colladon, F. Grippa

TL;DR
This study explores how self-report accuracy and social network centrality relate to academic performance among undergraduates, revealing that less accurate self-reporting correlates with lower achievement and centrality in advice networks predicts higher performance.
Contribution
It introduces the novel idea of using self-report accuracy and network centrality as indicators of academic success, controlling for various individual factors.
Findings
Lower achieving students are less accurate in self-reporting.
Higher centrality in advice networks correlates with better academic performance.
Self-report accuracy could serve as a new metric for academic assessment.
Abstract
This study investigates the correlation of self-report accuracy with academic performance. The sample was composed of 289 undergraduate students (96 senior and 193 junior) enrolled in two engineering classes. Age ranged between 22 and 24 years, with a slight over representation of male students (53%). Academic performance was calculated based on students' final grades in each class. The tendency to report inaccurate information was measured at the end of the Raven Progressive Matrices Test, by asking students to report their exact finishing times. We controlled for gender, age, personality traits, intelligence, and past academic performance. We also included measures of centrality in their friendship, advice and trust networks. Correlation and multiple regression analyses results indicate that lower achieving students were significantly less accurate in self-reporting data. We also…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
