Measuring Financial Advice: aligning client elicited and revealed risk
John R.J. Thompson, Longlong Feng, R. Mark Reesor, Chuck Grace, Adam, Metzler

TL;DR
This paper introduces a value-at-risk methodology to compare clients' stated risk profiles with their actual investment portfolios, providing insights for better risk alignment and compliance in financial advising.
Contribution
It demonstrates the effectiveness of using value-at-risk to measure and compare elicited and revealed client risk, enhancing portfolio alignment and compliance.
Findings
Value-at-risk effectively measures client risk discrepancies.
Portfolio risk aligns with KYC profiles when monitored.
Risk misalignments can be identified and addressed.
Abstract
Financial advisors use questionnaires and discussions with clients to determine a suitable portfolio of assets that will allow clients to reach their investment objectives. Financial institutions assign risk ratings to each security they offer, and those ratings are used to guide clients and advisors to choose an investment portfolio risk that suits their stated risk tolerance. This paper compares client Know Your Client (KYC) profile risk allocations to their investment portfolio risk selections using a value-at-risk discrepancy methodology. Value-at-risk is used to measure elicited and revealed risk to show whether clients are over-risked or under-risked, changes in KYC risk lead to changes in portfolio configuration, and cash flow affects a client's portfolio risk. We demonstrate the effectiveness of value-at-risk at measuring clients' elicited and revealed risk on a dataset provided…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
