A two-year intercomparison of CW focusing wind lidar and tall mast wind measurements at Cabauw
Steven Knoop, Fred Bosveld, Marijn de Haij, Arnoud Apituley

TL;DR
This study compares two years of wind measurements from a CW focusing wind lidar and a tall meteorological mast at Cabauw, demonstrating high data availability and accuracy, with some errors corrected using auxiliary data.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive intercomparison of CW focusing wind lidar data with mast measurements, highlighting data quality, availability, and correction methods under various conditions.
Findings
Lidar data availability is 97-98% under typical conditions.
Mean wind speed bias is within 0.1 m/s with high correlation.
Wind direction bias is within 2 degrees, with a 180° error reduced below 2% using correction.
Abstract
A two-year measurement campaign of the ZephIR 300 vertical profiling continuous-wave (CW) focusing wind lidar has been carried out by the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI) at the Cabauw site. We focus on the (height-dependent) data availability of the wind lidar under various meteorological conditions and the data quality through a comparison with in situ wind measurements at several levels in the 213-m tall meteorological mast. We find an overall availability of quality controlled wind lidar data of 97 % to 98 %, where the missing part is mainly due to precipitation events exceeding 1 mm/h or fog or low clouds below 100 m. The mean bias in the horizontal wind speed is within 0.1 m/s with a high correlation between the mast and wind lidar measurements, although under some specific conditions (very high wind speed, fog or low clouds) larger deviations are observed. The…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
