A comparative study of Higgs boson production from vector-boson fusion
A. Buckley, X. Chen, J. Cruz-Martinez, S. Ferrario Ravasio, T., Gehrmann, E.W.N. Glover, S. H\"oche, A. Huss, J. Huston, J.M. Lindert, S., Pl\"atzer, M. Sch\"onherr

TL;DR
This paper compares high-precision theoretical predictions for Higgs boson production via vector-boson fusion at high transverse momentum, analyzing the effects of QCD corrections, jet definitions, and backgrounds to improve understanding of this process.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of fixed-order and matched calculations for VBF Higgs production, emphasizing high transverse momentum regions and jet radius effects.
Findings
NNLO corrections have a mild impact on predictions.
Good agreement between fixed-order and NLOPS calculations in key regions.
Background suppression strategies depend on jet radius and kinematic cuts.
Abstract
The data taken in Run II at the LHC have started to probe Higgs boson production at high transverse momentum. Future data will provide a large sample of events with boosted Higgs boson topologies, allowing for a detailed understanding of electroweak Higgs boson plus two-jet production, and in particular the vector-boson fusion mode (VBF). We perform a detailed comparison of precision calculations for Higgs boson production in this channel, with particular emphasis on large Higgs boson transverse momenta, and on the jet radius dependence of the cross section. We study fixed-order predictions at NLO and NNLO QCD, and compare the results to NLO plus parton shower (NLOPS) matched calculations. The impact of the NNLO corrections on the central predictions is mild, with inclusive scale uncertainties of the order of a few percent, which can increase with the imposition of kinematic cuts. We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
