On planar arcs of size $(q+3)/2$
G\"ulizar G\"unay, Michel Lavrauw

TL;DR
This paper provides a concise proof regarding the completeness of small arcs in projective planes, specifically those with many points on a conic, offering an alternative to previous lengthy proofs and correcting a misconception.
Contribution
It presents a short, comprehensive proof of the completeness of certain arcs in PG(2,q), addressing an open problem and correcting prior misconceptions.
Findings
Confirmed completeness of arcs with at least (q+1)/2 points on a conic
Provided an alternative, shorter proof to Segre's open problem
Counterexample to a misconception in existing literature
Abstract
The subject of this paper is the study of small complete arcs in , for odd, with at least points on a conic. We give a short comprehensive proof of the completeness problem left open by Segre in his seminal work [20]. This gives an alternative to Pellegrino's long proof which was obtained in a series of papers in the 1980s. As a corollary of our analysis, we obtain a counterexample to a misconception in the literature [6].
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
