Closure relations during the plateau emission of Swift GRBs and the fundamental plane
M. G. Dainotti, A. {\L}. Lenart, N. Fraija, S. Nagataki, D. C. Warren,, B. De Simone, G. Srinivasaragavan, A. Mata

TL;DR
This study tests closure relations during GRB plateau emissions using Swift data, analyzes their environments, and explores the fundamental plane relation to identify potential standard candles and reduce scatter.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of closure relations in GRB plateaus, linking emission mechanisms, environments, and the fundamental plane to improve understanding and standardization.
Findings
Most GRBs with plateau emission fulfill closure relations, especially Wind SC environments.
sGRBs in ISM environments with q=0 have minimal intrinsic scatter in the fundamental plane.
Subsamples fulfilling specific relations can serve as standard candles, reducing scatter.
Abstract
The Neil Gehrels Swift observatory observe Gamma-Ray bursts (GRBs) plateaus in X-rays. We test the reliability of the closure relations through the fireball model when dealing with the GRB plateau emission. We analyze 455 X-ray lightcurves (LCs) collected by \emph{Swift} from 2005 (January) until 2019 (August) for which the redshift is both known and unknown using the phenomenological Willingale 2007 model. Using these fits, we analyze the emission mechanisms and astrophysical environments of these GRBs through the closure relations within the time interval of the plateau emission. Finally, we test the 3D fundamental plane relation (Dainotti relation) which connects the prompt peak luminosity, the time at the end of the plateau (rest-frame), and the luminosity at that time, on the GRBs with redshift, concerning groups determined by the closure relations. This allows us to check if the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
