Measuring the impact of spammers on e-mail and Twitter networks
A. Fronzetti Colladon, P. A. Gloor

TL;DR
This study examines whether spammers significantly distort social network structures in Twitter and email data, finding minimal impact on core network metrics and providing insights into network robustness and analysis strategies.
Contribution
It offers a comparative analysis of network robustness after removing spammers and connected nodes, extending understanding of social network stability and metric reliability.
Findings
Spammers do not significantly alter network structure metrics.
Network robustness remains stable after removing spammers and extreme nodes.
Language analysis reveals insights when email content cannot be accessed.
Abstract
This paper investigates the research question if senders of large amounts of irrelevant or unsolicited information - commonly called "spammers" - distort the network structure of social networks. Two large social networks are analyzed, the first extracted from the Twitter discourse about a big telecommunication company, and the second obtained from three years of email communication of 200 managers working for a large multinational company. This work compares network robustness and the stability of centrality and interaction metrics, as well as the use of language, after removing spammers and the most and least connected nodes. The results show that spammers do not significantly alter the structure of the information-carrying network, for most of the social indicators. The authors additionally investigate the correlation between e-mail subject line and content by tracking language…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
