The SAMI Galaxy Survey: The role of disc fading and progenitor bias in kinematic transitions
S. M. Croom (1, 2, 3), D.S. Taranu (3, 4, 5), J. van de, Sande (1, 2), C.D.P. Lagos (2, 4), K.E. Harborne (2, 4), J., Bland-Hawthorn (1, 2), S. Brough (6, 2), J.J. Bryant (1, 2), L., Cortese (2, 4), C. Foster (1, 2), M. Goodwin (7), B. Groves (2, 4, and 8), A. Khalid (1)

TL;DR
This study investigates how disc fading and progenitor bias contribute to the transformation of spiral galaxies into lenticulars, finding that passive aging alone cannot fully explain observed kinematic and structural changes.
Contribution
The paper combines galaxy modeling and simulations to quantify the roles of disc fading and progenitor bias in galaxy morphological transitions.
Findings
Disc fading causes a decline in galaxy spin and increased concentration.
Passive aging alone cannot account for all observed differences in S0 galaxies.
Progenitor bias, including size evolution, influences the transition, indicating intrinsic dynamical evolution is also important.
Abstract
We use comparisons between the SAMI Galaxy Survey and equilibrium galaxy models to infer the importance of disc fading in the transition of spirals into lenticular (S0) galaxies. The local S0 population has both higher photometric concentration and lower stellar spin than spiral galaxies of comparable mass and we test whether this separation can be accounted for by passive aging alone. We construct a suite of dynamically self--consistent galaxy models, with a bulge, disc and halo using the GalactICS code. The dispersion-dominated bulge is given a uniformly old stellar population, while the disc is given a current star formation rate putting it on the main sequence, followed by sudden instantaneous quenching. We then generate mock observables (r-band images, stellar velocity and dispersion maps) as a function of time since quenching for a range of bulge/total (B/T) mass ratios. The disc…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
