An Essential Local Geometric Morphism which is not Locally Connected though its Inverse Image Part defines an Exponential Ideal
Richard Garner, Thomas Streicher

TL;DR
This paper constructs an example of a local geometric morphism that is essential but not locally connected, yet its inverse image part forms an exponential ideal, highlighting a nuanced distinction in topos theory.
Contribution
It introduces a specific example of an essential local geometric morphism lacking local connectedness, expanding understanding of morphism properties in topos theory.
Findings
The morphism is essential but not locally connected.
Its inverse image part forms an exponential ideal.
The example clarifies distinctions in morphism properties.
Abstract
We describe an essential local geometric morphism which is not locally connected, though its inverse image part defines an exponential ideal
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCommutative Algebra and Its Applications · Rings, Modules, and Algebras · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
