The Detectability of Nightside City Lights on Exoplanets
Thomas G. Beatty

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the potential to detect artificial city lights on habitable exoplanets using future space telescopes, finding that certain urbanization levels around M-dwarfs and nearby stars could be observable, informing the search for technological life.
Contribution
It provides the first estimates of the detectability of nightside city lights on exoplanets with upcoming direct-imaging missions like LUVOIR and HabEx, considering various urbanization scenarios.
Findings
Detectable city lights on planets around M-dwarfs at 0.4%–3% urbanization.
Proxima b could show city lights twelve times Earth's level.
Ecumenopolis planets could be detected around 30–50 nearby stars.
Abstract
Next-generation missions designed to detect biosignatures on exoplanets will also be capable of placing constraints on technosignatures (evidence for technological life) on these same worlds. Here, I estimate the detectability of nightside city lights on habitable, Earth-like, exoplanets around nearby stars using direct-imaging observations from the proposed LUVOIR and HabEx observatories, assuming these lights come from high-pressure sodium lamps. I consider how the detectability scales with urbanization fraction: from Earth's value of 0.05%, up to the limiting case of an ecumenopolis -- or planet-wide city. Though an Earth analog would not be detectable by LUVOIR or HabEx, planets around M-dwarfs close to the Sun would show detectable signals at from city lights, using 300 hours of observing time, for urbanization levels of 0.4% to 3%, while city lights on planets around…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
