Asteroid lightcurves and detection, shape, and size biases in large-scale surveys
Samuel Navarro-Meza, Erin Aadland, David Trilling

TL;DR
This paper investigates how elongated asteroids can be detected in large-scale surveys beyond their sensitivity limits, revealing biases in size and shape distributions due to lightcurve amplitude effects.
Contribution
It introduces a model for detecting elongated asteroids beyond sensitivity limits and highlights biases in population property estimations.
Findings
Asteroids up to 1 magnitude fainter can be detected.
Detection bias affects size and shape distribution estimates.
Lightcurve amplitude influences detection likelihood.
Abstract
Most asteroids are somewhat elongated and have non-zero lightcurve amplitudes. Such asteroids can be detected in large-scale sky surveys even if their mean magnitudes are fainter than the stated sensitivity limits. We explore the detection of elongated asteroids under a set of idealized but useful approximations. We find that objects up to 1 magnitude fainter than a survey's sensitivity limit are likely to be detected, and that the effect is most pronounced for asteroids with lightcurve amplitudes 0.1-0.4 mag.This imposes a bias on the derived size and shape distributions of the population that must be properly accounted for.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
