Human-agent coordination in a group formation game
Tuomas Takko, Kunal Bhattacharya, Daniel Monsivais, Kimmo Kaski

TL;DR
This study investigates how human behavior adapts in a group formation game involving autonomous agents, revealing increased risk-taking and the impact of team composition on cluster formation.
Contribution
It demonstrates how human decision-making changes in mixed human-agent teams and explores the influence of team composition on cooperative behavior and performance.
Findings
Humans become less risk averse when playing with autonomous agents.
Team composition influences the evolution of clusters in the game.
Hybrid teams can maintain efficiency by balancing selfish and cooperative actions.
Abstract
Coordination and cooperation between humans and autonomous agents in cooperative games raises interesting questions of human decision making and behaviour changes. Here we report our findings from a group formation game in a small-world network of different mixes of human and agent players, aiming to achieve connected clusters of the same colour by swapping places with neighbouring players using non-overlapping information. In the experiments the human players are incentivized by rewarding to prioritize their own cluster while the model of agents' decision making is derived from our previous experiment of purely cooperative game between human players. The experiments were performed by grouping the players in three different setups to investigate the overall effect of having cooperative autonomous agents within teams. We observe that the change in the behavior of human subjects adjusts…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
