Exploring trade-offs between landscape impact, land use and resource quality for onshore variable renewable energy: an application to Great Britain

TL;DR

This study analyzes the trade-offs between landscape impact, land use, and resource quality for onshore wind and PV in Great Britain, highlighting constraints on technical potential and suggesting policy alignment.

Contribution

It introduces an integrated geospatial and aesthetic assessment method to evaluate land use and landscape impacts on VRE deployment in GB.

Findings

Large technical potentials for wind and PV are constrained by landscape and land use.

Strong correlation between scenicness and wind planning outcomes, but not for PV.

Potential for rooftop PV is significant but varies across cities and scales.

Abstract

The ambitious Net Zero aspirations of Great Britain (GB) require massive and rapid developments of Variable Renewable Energy (VRE) technologies. GB possesses substantial resources for these technologies, but questions remain about which VRE should be exploited where. This study explores the trade-offs between landscape impact, land use competition and resource quality for onshore wind as well as ground- and roof-mounted photovoltaic (PV) systems for GB. These trade-offs constrain the technical and economic potentials for these technologies at the Local Authority level. Our approach combines techno-economic and geospatial analyses with crowd-sourced scenicness data to quantify landscape aesthetics. Despite strong correlations between scenicness and planning application outcomes for onshore wind, no such relationship exists for ground-mounted PV. The innovative method for rooftop-PV assessment combines bottom-up analysis of four cities with a top-down approach at the national level. The results show large technical potentials that are strongly constrained by both landscape and land use aspects. This equates to about 1324 TWh of onshore wind, 153 TWh of rooftop PV and 1200-7093 TWh ground-mounted PV, depending on scenario. We conclude with five recommendations that focus around aligning energy and planning policies for VRE technologies across multiple scales and governance arenas.