Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: A review
Shengze Cai, Zhiping Mao, Zhicheng Wang, Minglang Yin, George Em, Karniadakis

TL;DR
This review discusses physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) as a promising approach to integrate data and physics for fluid mechanics problems, addressing challenges like noisy data, complex geometries, and high-dimensionality.
Contribution
The paper provides a comprehensive review of PINNs in fluid mechanics, highlighting their ability to solve inverse problems and integrate data with Navier-Stokes equations.
Findings
PINNs effectively handle inverse flow problems.
PINNs demonstrate success in 3D wake, supersonic, and biomedical flows.
PINNs offer a seamless integration of data and physics.
Abstract
Despite the significant progress over the last 50 years in simulating flow problems using numerical discretization of the Navier-Stokes equations (NSE), we still cannot incorporate seamlessly noisy data into existing algorithms, mesh-generation is complex, and we cannot tackle high-dimensional problems governed by parametrized NSE. Moreover, solving inverse flow problems is often prohibitively expensive and requires complex and expensive formulations and new computer codes. Here, we review flow physics-informed learning, integrating seamlessly data and mathematical models, and implementing them using physics-informed neural networks (PINNs). We demonstrate the effectiveness of PINNs for inverse problems related to three-dimensional wake flows, supersonic flows, and biomedical flows.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsModel Reduction and Neural Networks · Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows · Nuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics
