Undecidability in resource theory: can you tell theories apart?
Matteo Scandi, Jacopo Surace

TL;DR
This paper proves that determining whether two quantum resource theories are equivalent or can be characterized by the same monotones is undecidable, by showing the membership problem for CPTP maps is undecidable.
Contribution
It establishes the undecidability of core problems in quantum resource theories, highlighting fundamental limits in their computational characterization.
Findings
Membership problem for CPTP maps is undecidable.
Decidability issues extend to characterizations of resource theories.
Fundamental limits in quantum resource theory classification.
Abstract
A central question in resource theory is whether one can construct a set of monotones that completely characterise the allowed transitions dictated by a set of free operations. A similar question is whether two distinct sets of free operations generate the same class of transitions. These questions are part of the more general problem of whether it is possible to pass from one characterisation of a resource theory to another. In the present letter we prove that in the context of quantum resource theories this class of problems is undecidable in general. This is done by proving the undecidability of the membership problem for CPTP maps, which subsumes all the other results.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEconomic theories and models · Advanced Topology and Set Theory · Game Theory and Applications
