Expecting the unexpected in the search for extraterrestrial life
Peter Vickers

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the principle of 'expecting the unexpected' in exoplanet research, analyzing how scientific community strategies can incorporate risk management and the implications for high-impact space science projects.
Contribution
It offers a novel analysis of how the 'expect the unexpected' principle can be operationalized in space science, especially in balancing risk and reward in project selection.
Findings
High-risk projects are often undervalued despite potential high rewards.
A balanced portfolio approach can help manage scientific risks effectively.
NASA's attitude towards high-risk projects has evolved since 2009.
Abstract
On page 10 of the 2018 National Academies Exoplanet Science Strategy document (NASEM 2018), 'Expect the unexpected' is described as a general principle of the exoplanet field. But for the next 150 pages, this principle is apparently forgotten, as strategy decisions are repeatedly put forward based on our expectations. This paper explores what exactly it might mean to 'expect the unexpected', and how this could possibly be achieved by the space science community. An analogy with financial investment strategies is considered, where a balanced portfolio of low/medium/high-risk investments is recommended. Whilst this kind of strategy would certainly be advisable in many scientific contexts (past and present), in certain contexts, especially exploratory science, a significant disanalogy needs to be factored in: financial investors cannot choose low-risk high-reward investments, but sometimes…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
