Demystifying autoparallels in alternative gravity
Yuri N. Obukhov, Dirk Puetzfeld

TL;DR
This paper clarifies the nature of autoparallel curves in alternative gravity, deriving them as effective constructs and arguing against their use as fundamental equations of motion for test bodies.
Contribution
It explicitly derives autoparallels as post-Riemannian geometric constructs and challenges their role as fundamental equations of motion in alternative gravity theories.
Findings
Autoparallels can be derived as effective geometric constructs.
Autoparallels should not be assumed as fundamental equations of motion.
The paper clarifies the geometric interpretation of autoparallels in alternative gravity.
Abstract
Autoparallel curves along with geodesic curves can arise as trajectories of physical test bodies. We explicitly derive autoparallels as effective post-Riemannian geometric constructs, and at the same time we argue \emph{against} postulating autoparallels as fundamental equations of motion for test bodies in alternative gravity theories.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
