Does "AI" stand for augmenting inequality in the era of covid-19 healthcare?
David Leslie, Anjali Mazumder, Aidan Peppin, Maria Wolters, Alexa, Hagerty

TL;DR
This paper discusses how AI used in covid-19 healthcare can unintentionally reinforce existing social inequalities, especially affecting marginalized communities, due to biases in data and design.
Contribution
It identifies three ways AI can reflect or introduce bias in health disparities and emphasizes the need for bias mitigation in AI deployment during the pandemic.
Findings
AI can entrench health discrimination in datasets
AI systems often lack representativeness of vulnerable groups
Biases in AI deployment can worsen health inequities
Abstract
Among the most damaging characteristics of the covid-19 pandemic has been its disproportionate effect on disadvantaged communities. As the outbreak has spread globally, factors such as systemic racism, marginalisation, and structural inequality have created path dependencies that have led to poor health outcomes. These social determinants of infectious disease and vulnerability to disaster have converged to affect already disadvantaged communities with higher levels of economic instability, disease exposure, infection severity, and death. Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are an important part of the health informatics toolkit used to fight contagious disease. AI is well known, however, to be susceptible to algorithmic biases that can entrench and augment existing inequality. Uncritically deploying AI in the fight against covid-19 thus risks amplifying the pandemic's adverse…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
