TL;DR
This paper presents a new attack method that successfully recovers private images from InstaHide even with data augmentation, demonstrating that InstaHide's privacy protection can be compromised.
Contribution
It introduces a fusion-denoising attack leveraging a comparative network and data augmentation to break InstaHide's privacy guarantees.
Findings
The attack outperforms previous methods in image recovery accuracy.
InstaHide with data augmentation is vulnerable to the proposed attack.
Extensive experiments validate the attack's effectiveness.
Abstract
InstaHide is a state-of-the-art mechanism for protecting private training images, by mixing multiple private images and modifying them such that their visual features are indistinguishable to the naked eye. In recent work, however, Carlini et al. show that it is possible to reconstruct private images from the encrypted dataset generated by InstaHide. Nevertheless, we demonstrate that Carlini et al.'s attack can be easily defeated by incorporating data augmentation into InstaHide. This leads to a natural question: is InstaHide with data augmentation secure? In this paper, we provide a negative answer to this question, by devising an attack for recovering private images from the outputs of InstaHide even when data augmentation is present. The basic idea is to use a comparative network to identify encrypted images that are likely to correspond to the same private image, and then employ a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
