A Complete Axiomatisation for Divergence Preserving Branching Congruence of Finite-State Behaviours
Xinxin Liu, Tingting Yu

TL;DR
This paper introduces a complete set of axioms for divergence preserving branching congruence in finite-state behaviors, resolving a long-standing open problem since 1993.
Contribution
It provides a sound and complete equational inference system specifically tailored for divergence sensitive semantics, refining previous axiomatizations.
Findings
The inference system is proven sound and complete.
It refines Rob van Glabbeek's axiomatization by removing an unsound axiom.
The system addresses divergence preserving branching congruence.
Abstract
We present an equational inference system for finite-state expressions, and prove that the system is sound and complete with respect to divergence preserving branching congruence, closing a problem that has been open since 1993. The inference system refines Rob van Glabbeek's simple and elegant complete axiomatisation for branching bisimulation congruence of finite-state behaviours by joining four simple axioms after dropping one axiom which is unsound under the more refined divergence sensitive semantics.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFormal Methods in Verification · Machine Learning and Algorithms · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
