Evolution of bare quark stars in full general relativity: Single star case
Enping Zhou, Kenta Kiuchi, Masaru Shibata, Antonios Tsokaros, Koji, Uryu

TL;DR
This paper presents a numerical relativity approach to simulate the evolution of bare quark stars, demonstrating the method's reliability and analyzing gravitational wave emissions and stability characteristics of such stars.
Contribution
The authors develop and validate a new numerical method for simulating bare quark stars in full general relativity, including handling surface discontinuities and mass ejection.
Findings
Quark stars can undergo non-axisymmetric instabilities similar to neutron stars.
Supramassive quark stars are unlikely to be continuous gravitational wave sources due to rapid axisymmetry recovery.
The method accurately resolves surface discontinuities and mass ejection in quark star simulations.
Abstract
We introduce our approaches, in particular the modifications of the primitive recovery procedure, to handle bare quark stars in numerical relativity simulations. Reliability and convergence of our implementation are demonstrated by evolving two triaxially rotating quark star models with different mass as well as a differentially rotating quark star model which has sufficiently large kinetic energy to be dynamically unstable. These simulations allow us to verify that our method is capable of resolving the evolution of the discontinuous surface of quark stars and possible mass ejection from them. The evolution of the triaxial deformation and the properties of the gravitational-wave emission from triaxially rotating quark stars have been also studied, together with the mass ejection of the differentially rotating case. It is found that supramassive quark stars are not likely to be ideal…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
