Consistency checks of results from a Monte Carlo code intercomparison for emitted electron spectra and energy deposition around a single gold nanoparticle irradiated by X-rays
H. Rabus (1,12), W.B. Li (2,12), H. Nettelbeck (1,12), J. Schuemann, (4,12), C. Villagrasa (3,12), M. Beuve (5,12), S. Di Maria (6,12), B. Heide, (7,13), A.P. Klapproth (2,8), F. Poignant (5,9), R. Qiu (10,12), B. Rudek, (4,11) ((1) Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt

TL;DR
This study evaluates the consistency of Monte Carlo simulations of electron spectra and energy deposition around gold nanoparticles irradiated by X-rays, using intercomparison data to validate simulation accuracy and cross-section datasets.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive evaluation of Monte Carlo code results for gold nanoparticle irradiation, highlighting internal consistency and the impact of different cross-section datasets.
Findings
Results are consistent across different codes and datasets.
Cross-validation of energy deposition ratios enhances simulation reliability.
Benchmarking against physical properties confirms simulation accuracy.
Abstract
Organized by the European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS), a Monte Carlo code intercomparison exercise was conducted where participants simulated the emitted electron spectra and energy deposition around a single gold nanoparticle (GNP) irradiated by X-rays. In the exercise, the participants scored energy imparted in concentric spherical shells around a spherical volume filled with gold or water as well as the spectral distribution of electrons leaving the GNP. Initially, only the ratio of energy deposition with and without GNP was to be reported. During the evaluation of the exercise, however, the data for energy deposition in the presence and absence of the GNP were also requested. A GNP size of 50 nm and 100 nm diameter was considered as well as two different X-ray spectra (50 kVp and 100kVp). This introduced a redundancy that can be used to cross-validate the internal…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
