Event rate predictions of strongly lensed gravitational waves with detector networks and more realistic templates
Lilan Yang, Shichao Wu, Kai Liao, Xuheng Ding, Zhiqiang You, Zhoujian, Cao, Marek Biesiada, Zong-Hong Zhu

TL;DR
This paper predicts the detection rates of strongly lensed gravitational waves using realistic templates and detector networks, finding significant improvements especially for third-generation detectors, and estimates hundreds of such events per year.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive simulation incorporating Earth's rotation and realistic wave templates to improve lensed GW event rate predictions across multiple detector generations.
Findings
Detection rate increases by ~37% with realistic templates.
Network detection further boosts rates by ~58%.
Third-generation detectors could observe hundreds of lensed events annually.
Abstract
Strong lensing of gravitational waves (GWs) is attracting growing attention of the community. The event rates of lensed GWs by galaxies were predicted in numerous papers, which used some approximations to evaluate the GW strains detectable by a single detector. The joint-detection of GW signals by a network of instruments will increase the detecting ability of fainter and farther GW signals, which could increase the detection rate of the lensed GWs, especially for the 3rd generation detectors, e.g., Einstein Telescope (ET) and Cosmic Explorer (CE). Moreover, realistic GW templates will improve the accuracy of the prediction. In this work, we consider the detection of galaxy-scale lensed GW events under the 2nd, 2.5th, and 3rd generation detectors with the network scenarios and adopt the realistic templates to simulate GW signals. Our forecast is based on the Monte Carlo technique which…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
