Keep Your Distance: Land Division With Separation
Edith Elkind, Erel Segal-Halevi, Warut Suksompong

TL;DR
This paper investigates fair land division with geometric and separation constraints, establishing bounds on fairness guarantees and analyzing the complexity of finding such partitions using computational geometry tools.
Contribution
It introduces bounds on maximin share fairness for land plots with geometric shapes and separation, advancing practical fair division methods.
Findings
Bounds on maximin share guarantees for squares and rectangles
Analysis of algorithmic complexity for fair land division
Use of computational geometry tools in fair division
Abstract
This paper is part of an ongoing endeavor to bring the theory of fair division closer to practice by handling requirements from real-life applications. We focus on two requirements originating from the division of land estates: (1) each agent should receive a plot of a usable geometric shape, and (2) plots of different agents must be physically separated. With these requirements, the classic fairness notion of \emph{proportionality} is impractical, since it may be impossible to attain any multiplicative approximation of it. In contrast, the \emph{ordinal maximin share approximation}, introduced by Budish in 2011, provides meaningful fairness guarantees. We prove upper and lower bounds on achievable maximin share guarantees when the usable shapes are squares, fat rectangles, or arbitrary axis-aligned rectangles, and explore the algorithmic and query complexity of finding fair partitions…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Voting Systems
