What Clinical Trials Can Teach Us about the Development of More Resilient AI for Cybersecurity
Edmon Begoli, Robert A. Bridges, Sean Oesch, Kathryn E. Knight

TL;DR
This paper argues that rigorous, policy-driven clinical trial models from medicine can improve the development and evaluation of resilient AI cybersecurity tools, emphasizing transparency and prioritization of research.
Contribution
It introduces a novel framework inspired by biomedical clinical trials to enhance AI cybersecurity development and evaluation processes.
Findings
Proposes a clinical trial-inspired model for AI cybersecurity evaluation
Highlights the importance of transparency in AI tool efficacy
Draws parallels between biomedical and cybersecurity development processes
Abstract
Policy-mandated, rigorously administered scientific testing is needed to provide transparency into the efficacy of artificial intelligence-based (AI-based) cyber defense tools for consumers and to prioritize future research and development. In this article, we propose a model that is informed by our experience, urged forward by massive scale cyberattacks, and inspired by parallel developments in the biomedical field and the unprecedentedly fast development of new vaccines to combat global pathogens.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research
