Explaining the MiniBooNE Excess Through a Mixed Model of Oscillation and Decay
Stefano Vergani, Nicholas W. Kamp, Alejandro Diaz, Carlos A., Arg\"uelles, Janet M. Conrad, Michael H. Shaevitz, Melissa A. Uchida

TL;DR
This paper proposes a combined oscillation and decay model to explain the MiniBooNE excess, significantly improving fit quality over previous models and predicting no clear oscillation signature in upcoming experiments.
Contribution
It introduces a novel mixed model of neutrino oscillation and decay that better fits MiniBooNE data than single sterile neutrino models.
Findings
Significant fit improvement with $ ext{Δ} ext{χ}^2$/dof = 19.3/2
Predicted decay coupling of $2.8 imes 10^{-7}$ GeV$^{-1}$
No clear oscillation signature expected in FNAL short baseline program
Abstract
The electron-like excess observed by the MiniBooNE experiment is explained with a model comprising a new low mass state ( eV) participating in neutrino oscillations and a new high mass state ( MeV) that decays to . Short-baseline oscillation data sets are used to predict the oscillation parameters. Fitting the MiniBooNE energy and scattering angle data, there is a narrow joint allowed region for the decay contribution at 95% CL. The result is a substantial improvement over the single sterile neutrino oscillation model, with = 19.3/2 for a decay coupling of GeV, high mass state of 376 MeV, oscillation mixing angle of and mass splitting of eV. This model predicts that no clear oscillation signature will be observed in the FNAL short baseline program due to the low…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
