Characterization of Jordan centralizers and Jordan two-sided centralizers on triangular rings without assuming unity
Amin Hosseini, others

TL;DR
This paper proves that Jordan centralizers and Jordan two-sided centralizers are actually centralizers on triangular rings without the need for a unity assumption, and explores related derivation properties.
Contribution
It establishes that Jordan centralizers and Jordan two-sided centralizers coincide with centralizers on triangular rings without assuming the existence of a unity element.
Findings
Jordan centralizers are centralizers on triangular rings
Jordan two-sided centralizers are centralizers on triangular rings
Jordan generalized derivations are two-sided generalized derivations
Abstract
The main purpose of this paper is to show that every Jordan centralizer and every Jordan two-sided centralizer is a centralizer on triangular rings without assuming unity. As an application, we prove that every Jordan generalized derivation on a triangular ring is a two-sided generalized derivation. Some other related results are also discussed.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topics in Algebra · Matrix Theory and Algorithms · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
