A detailed analysis of GW190521 with phenomenological waveform models
H\'ector Estell\'es, Sascha Husa, Marta Colleoni, Maite Mateu-Lucena,, Maria de Lluc Planas, Cecilio Garc\'ia-Quir\'os, David Keitel, Antoni, Ramos-Buades, Ajit Kumar Mehta, Alessandra Buonanno, Serguei Ossokine

TL;DR
This paper conducts an extensive analysis of the GW190521 gravitational wave event using advanced phenomenological waveform models, addressing challenges posed by short signals and multi-modal posteriors, and clarifying previous findings.
Contribution
It introduces a new fast time-domain waveform model IMRPhenomTPHM and provides a comprehensive analysis of GW190521 with robustness checks and updated astrophysical inferences.
Findings
Confirmed multi-modal posterior distribution for GW190521
Reduced support for high-mass ratio and PISN mass-gap hypotheses
Updated probabilities for electromagnetic counterpart association
Abstract
In this paper we present an extensive analysis of the GW190521 gravitational wave event with the current (fourth) generation of phenomenological waveform models for binary black hole coalescences. GW190521 stands out from other events since only a few wave cycles are observable. This leads to a number of challenges, one being that such short signals are prone to not resolve approximate waveform degeneracies, which may result in multi-modal posterior distributions. The family of waveform models we use includes a new fast time-domain model IMRPhenomTPHM, which allows us extensive tests of different priors and robustness with respect to variations in the waveform model, including the content of spherical harmonic modes. We clarify some issues raised in a recent paper [Nitz&Capano], associated with possible support for a high-mass ratio source, but confirm their finding of a multi-modal…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
