On Information-Theoretic Classical Verification of Quantum Computers
Ayal Green

TL;DR
This paper explores the limitations of classical verification protocols for quantum computations, showing they require very powerful provers and suggesting potential directions for protocols with weaker provers like quantum computers.
Contribution
It introduces a family of verification protocols for quantum computations and proves their inherent requirement for powerful provers, extending previous known protocols.
Findings
Any protocol in this family requires an extremely powerful prover.
The analysis suggests possible approaches for protocols with weaker provers, such as quantum computers.
The work generalizes existing protocols like AAV13 and AG17.
Abstract
Quantum inspired protocols e.g. [AAV13,AG17] attempt to achieve a single-prover interactive protocol where a classical machine can verify quantum computations in an information-theoretically secure manner. We define a family of protocols which seem natural for verifying quantum computations and generalizes such known protocols, namely those of [AAV13,AG17]. We show that any protocol from this family is bound to require an extremely powerful prover, much like the classical protocols of [LFKN92] and [Sha92]. Using our analysis, we also hint at possible ways one might try to realize a protocol where the prover can be weaker, namely a quantum computer (i.e. a BQP machine).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture · Quantum Mechanics and Applications · Quantum Information and Cryptography
