Surrogate modelling the Baryonic Universe II: on forward modelling the colours of individual and populations of galaxies
Jonas Chaves-Montero, Andrew Hearin

TL;DR
This paper investigates how unresolved star formation variability affects galaxy colour predictions, introducing a metric for burstiness and demonstrating that simple models suffice for population colours but complex models are needed for individual galaxy accuracy.
Contribution
It develops a new burstiness metric, constructs adjustable SFH models, and provides a fitting function linking variability to colour prediction precision.
Findings
Higher star formation variability degrades colour prediction accuracy.
Metallicity and dust variability have negligible impact on colours.
Simple models can accurately reproduce population colours, complex models needed for individual galaxies.
Abstract
Among the properties shaping the light of a galaxy, the star formation history (SFH) is one of the most challenging to model due to the variety of correlated physical processes regulating star formation. In this work, we leverage the stellar population synthesis model FSPS, together with SFHs predicted by the hydrodynamical simulation IllustrisTNG and the empirical model UNIVERSEMACHINE, to study the impact of star formation variability on galaxy colours. We start by introducing a model-independent metric to quantify the burstiness of a galaxy formation model, and we use this metric to demonstrate that UNIVERSEMACHINE predicts SFHs with more burstiness relative to IllustrisTNG. Using this metric and principal component analysis, we construct families of SFH models with adjustable variability, and we show that the precision of broad-band optical and near-infrared colours degrades as the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
